Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Is China making real progress in moving to a Green Economy?

A couple sharing a bicycle ride past ele
Cycling in Beijing. There are reasons and motivation to be hopeful about China's progress for a greener economy. Photograph: Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images

Times are tough, but I predict 2014 is going to be a vintage year for sustainability-focused policymakers.

Global investment in clean energy was down last year at $254bn (£153bn) from a high of $317.9bn of 2011, with Europe leading the downward charge with a year-on-year decline of 41%.
These poor statistics may not reflect future trends. Japanese as well as emerging market investments in renewables have increased and remained stable respectively. However, they reinforce the view that financial markets are not doing their job, allocating capital in ways that will support a sustainable global economy over the long term.

Without reshaping the financial system, there is little prospect of private capital driving the transition to a sustainable economy. More likely is that it will reinforce the problem by continuing to flow to carbon and natural resource intense investments.

Against all the odds, and despite the recent evidence of how difficult it is to move forward any substantive financial regulatory agenda, I am optimistic that we can green the financial system, and that 2014 can be a year where significant progress is made.
My optimism is largely through the lens of two initiatives in which I am involved. The first concerns growing policy interest in China as to whether and how its game-changing financial market reform process can be made greener.

Last week in Beijing, the Financial Research Institute of the influential Development Research Center of the State Council, together with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, released the report of an initial exploration on Greening China's Financial System (PDF). The report, which I co-authored, makes the case for financial policy and regulatory action in ensuring that financial institutions correctly value climate and broader green risks, and that financial regulators recognise their role in ensuring that financial markets fulfil their underlying purpose of investing in the long-term health of the real economy.

China's interest in such an agenda, along with a growing number of other emerging nations, carries no mystery. The country's success depends on massive investment in developing a less toxic, more viable economy, covering carbon but more immediately addressing water scarcity and quality, air pollution and food safety.

China's financial regulators are very attuned to high-level policy signals, and so consider real economy issues more readily than most of their OECD counterparts. The relevant policy memo simply says the problem has to be fixed quickly and that China can derive major economic benefits along the way.
The country's financial system is very much still in development, and China does not wish to emulate the problems of Wall Street and the City. Actors in China's financial markets have neither the political muscle, nor necessarily the will, to overcome strong policy channelling by the Chinese government.
My second source of optimism derives from the launch on Wednesday in Geneva of an international inquiry into policy options for advancing a sustainable financial system. Alongside Nick Robins, currently head of the HSBC Climate Change Centre, I am to be part of the inquiry's leadership team. The inquiry, championed by UNEP as part of its green economy focus and leveraging the strengths of the UNEP Finance Initiative, aims to map existing experimentation in green financial regulation, catalyse and collaborate with policy research partners, and link a growing number of complementary initiatives in green and sustainable finance.

Optimism about advancing financial market reform may seem pollyannaish in the light of the complex political economy that has made progress so difficult. Yet each quantum change has its historical moment, that peculiar confluence of circumstances that makes change possible if not inevitable.

That moment may well have arrived for the financial system, made possible in particular by its recent track record, the leadership of emerging nations, the start of the world's first inquiry into how to make green the financial markets, and of course the increasingly obvious green imperative.

Friday, April 19, 2013

China: CO2 Trading

The following news item , as reported by Reuters, speaks to the trading efficiency that we had discussed recently. Unfortunately, it also makes it clear that the EU plan for Cap  and Trade is in shambles.
*******************************************************************************


The crisis facing the European carbon market will not deter China from plans to establish its own emissions trading platform or its other climate pledges, the senior official responsible for climate change said on Thursday.
Xie Zhenhua, vice-director of the National Development and Reform Commission in charge of climate policies, said efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions were a "domestic requirement". They were, he said, designed to address longstanding inefficiency and environmental problems, and did not depend on other nations, or on the state of the economy.
"China has pledged these targets to the international community to deal with climate change and they will not change," he said at an event in Beijing. "Even if other countries say they will do nothing, we will keep to our strategy. No matter what happens to our economy, we cannot make any change."
The global financial crisis has saddled Europe's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) with a crushing oversupply of carbon credits and record low prices, but the EU parliament this week rejected proposals to bail the market out.
The ETS allows enterprises to meet their carbon reduction targets by purchasing carbon credits from the market, enabling them to keep emitting greenhouse gases. Many credits have been generated by low-carbon projects in China as part of a United Nations scheme known as the Clean Development Mechanism.
China is planning a similar domestic scheme in which carbon-intensive enterprises and industries can meet their own targets by acquiring the emission quotas allocated to other firms.
Xie said China ultimately sought to link its carbon trading platforms with those elsewhere, but was focused now on domestic needs.
"In the future we will establish a link, but in the next few years we first need to establish a carbon market according to Chinese conditions and the conditions of developing countries," he said.
LEARNING FROM EUROPE
He said China would learn from mistakes made in Europe, especially when it comes to prices, with Shanghai set to include a mechanism by which carbon credits can be taken off the market when supplies are too high and prices too low.
Carbon prices on Europe's ETS were trading at an all-time low of 2.46 euros ($3.21) per tonne on Tuesday, down from 18 euros just two years ago. Xie said the problem was that the mandatory emission cuts in Europe had been set too low.
"Why have the prices gone from such a high to such a low? Because of the rate of emissions cuts," he said. "If it was higher, and if there were more pressures, the market would be much more active. It is probably related to the initial design of the exchange and the way emissions targets were allocated."
China is the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases on an aggregate basis, but levels are low in per capita terms.
Xie said China's pilot carbon market scheme was on track, with trading to begin in the southeastern city of Shenzhen in June and later in the business hub of Shanghai before year-end.
But he said China would find it increasingly difficult to meet its 2020 climate change pledges. Problems, he said, would "get harder and harder and the costs will be higher and higher".
China has pledged to reduce 2011 levels of carbon intensity -- the amount of climate-warming carbon dioxide produced per unit of GDP growth -- by 40-45 percent by 2020.
It has also vowed to increase the share of non-fossil fuel energy to 15 percent of its total energy mix by the same period and close vast swathes of inefficient industrial capacity.